↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reliability and criterion-related validity of the 20-yard shuttle test in competitive junior tennis players

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and criterion-related validity of the 20-yard shuttle test in competitive junior tennis players
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s86442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Eriksson, Fredrik R Johansson, Maria Bäck

Abstract

This study adds to the previous work in the field of sport-specific fitness testing by evaluating a tennis-specific agility test called "the 20-yard shuttle test". The aim of the study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability, the inter-rater reliability, and the criterion-related validity of the 20-yard shuttle test on competitive junior tennis players. Totally, 34 Swedish tennis players (13 girls), mean age 14±1.6 years, participated in the study. To examine test-retest reliability, the subjects performed the 20-yard shuttle test three times on the same day and then the same procedure was repeated after 3 days. To test the inter-rater reliability, the time was measured with a stopwatch simultaneously by two different raters. The time recorded manually was compared to the gold standard of digital timing to evaluate the criterion-related validity. Excellent test-retest reliability was found both within the same day (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.95) and between days (ICC 0.91). Furthermore, the results showed excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.99) and criterion-related validity on both test occasions (ICC 0.99). We have provided introductory support for the 20-yard shuttle test as a reliable and valid test for use in competitive junior tennis players. The ease of administration makes this test a practical alternative to evaluate physical fitness in order to optimally train the athletes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 4 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 16 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#247
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,285
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.