↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Health behaviors and quality of life predictors for risk of hospitalization in an electronic health record-linked biobank

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Health behaviors and quality of life predictors for risk of hospitalization in an electronic health record-linked biobank
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s85473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Y Takahashi, Euijung Ryu, Janet E Olson, Erin M Winkler, Matthew A Hathcock, Ruchi Gupta, Jeff A Sloan, Jyotishman Pathak, Suzette J Bielinski, James R Cerhan

Abstract

Hospital risk stratification models using electronic health records (EHRs) often use age and comorbid health burden. Our primary aim was to determine if quality of life or health behaviors captured in an EHR-linked biobank can predict future risk of hospitalization. Participants in the Mayo Clinic Biobank completed self-administered questionnaires at enrollment that included quality of life and health behaviors. Participants enrolled as of December 31, 2010 were followed for one year to ascertain hospitalization. Data on comorbidities and hospitalization were derived from the Mayo Clinic EHR. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used, adjusted for age and sex. We used gradient boosting machines models to integrate multiple factors. Different models were compared using C-statistic. Of the 8,927 eligible Mayo Clinic Biobank participants, 834 (9.3%) were hospitalized. Self-perceived health status and alcohol use had the strongest associations with risk of hospitalization. Compared to participants with excellent self-perceived health, those reporting poor/fair health had higher risk of hospitalization (HR =3.66, 95% CI 2.74-4.88). Alcohol use was inversely associated with hospitalization (HR =0.57 95% CI 0.45-0.72). The gradient boosting machines model estimated self-perceived health as the most influential factor (relative influence =16%). The predictive ability of the model based on comorbidities was slightly higher than the one based on the self-perceived health (C-statistic =0.67 vs 0.65). This study demonstrates that self-perceived health may be an important piece of information to add to the EHR. It may be another method to determine hospitalization risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,879,823
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#135
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,713
of 264,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.