↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Equine pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction: current perspectives on diagnosis and management

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Equine pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction: current perspectives on diagnosis and management
Published in
Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/vmrr.s74191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline W Spelta

Abstract

Equine pituitary pars intermedia dysfunction (PPID) is a neurodegenerative disease of the hypothalamus, resulting in the loss of dopaminergic inhibition of pars intermedia. An oxidative stress injury of unknown etiology has been suggested to initiate the neurodegeneration. While hypertrichosis (formerly known as hirsutism) is considered pathognomic for advanced disease, the antemortem diagnosis of subclinical and early disease has continued to prove difficult. Numerous tests have been used with varying sensitivities and specificities. The overnight dexamethasone suppression test, originally documented to have 100% sensitivity and specificity in horses with advanced disease, has proven to be less valuable in identifying early disease. Basal plasma adrenocorticotropin concentrations have improved sensitivity and specificity when sampled during the autumn months, and α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, while not yet commercially available, shows promise as a sensitive and specific single sample test. Recent advances in our knowledge include the strong association between laminitis and hyperinsulinemia, both common clinical signs associated with PPID. The pathogenesis of hyperinsulinemia, laminitis, and their association with this disease is a focus of current research. The dopamine agonist pergolide mesylate is still the mainstay of medical management, with studies on oral bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and long-term survival rates now published.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 19 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,294,025
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#97
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,245
of 277,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Medicine : Research and Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them