↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

From bladder to systemic syndrome: concept and treatment evolution of interstitial cystitis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
From bladder to systemic syndrome: concept and treatment evolution of interstitial cystitis
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s60798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Dinis, Joana Tavares de Oliveira, Rui Pinto, Francisco Cruz, CA Tony Buffington, Paulo Dinis

Abstract

Interstitial cystitis, presently known as bladder pain syndrome, has been recognized for over a century but is still far from being understood. Its etiology is unknown and the syndrome probably harbors different diseases. Autoimmune dysfunction, urothelial leakage, infection, central and peripheral nervous system dysfunction, genetic disease, childhood trauma/abuse, and subsequent stress response system dysregulation might be implicated. Management is slowly evolving from a solo act by the end-organ specialist to a team approach based on new typing and phenotyping of the disease. However, oral and invasive treatments are still largely aimed at the bladder and are based on currently proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms. Future research will better define the disease, permitting individualization of treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#477
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,268
of 277,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.