↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Melanoma risk perception and prevention behavior among African-Americans: the minority melanoma paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Melanoma risk perception and prevention behavior among African-Americans: the minority melanoma paradox
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s87645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina Goldenberg, Igor Vujic, Martina Sanlorenzo, Susana Ortiz-Urda

Abstract

Melanoma is the most deadly type of skin cancer with 75% of all skin cancer deaths within the US attributed to it. Risk factors for melanoma include ultraviolet exposure, genetic predisposition, and phenotypic characteristics (eg, fair skin and blond hair). Whites have a 27-fold higher incidence of melanoma than African-Americans (AA), but the 5-year survival is 17.8% lower for AA than Whites. It is reported continuously that AA have more advanced melanomas at diagnosis, and overall lower survival rates. This minority melanoma paradox is not well understood or studied. To explore further, the possible explanations for the difference in melanoma severity and survival in AA within the US. Qualitative review of the literature. Lack of minority-targeted public education campaigns, low self-risk perception, low self-skin examinations, intrinsic virulence, vitamin D differences, and physician mistrust may play a role in the melanoma survival disparity among AA. Increases in public awareness of melanoma risk among AA through physician and media-guided education, higher index of suspicion among individuals and physicians, and policy changes can help to improve early detection and close the melanoma disparity gap in the future.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#807
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,285
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.