↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Computer-aided classification of lung nodules on computed tomography images via deep learning technique

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
443 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
Title
Computer-aided classification of lung nodules on computed tomography images via deep learning technique
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s80733
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kai-Lung Hua, Che-Hao Hsu, Shintami Chusnul Hidayati, Wen-Huang Cheng, Yu-Jen Chen

Abstract

Lung cancer has a poor prognosis when not diagnosed early and unresectable lesions are present. The management of small lung nodules noted on computed tomography scan is controversial due to uncertain tumor characteristics. A conventional computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme requires several image processing and pattern recognition steps to accomplish a quantitative tumor differentiation result. In such an ad hoc image analysis pipeline, every step depends heavily on the performance of the previous step. Accordingly, tuning of classification performance in a conventional CAD scheme is very complicated and arduous. Deep learning techniques, on the other hand, have the intrinsic advantage of an automatic exploitation feature and tuning of performance in a seamless fashion. In this study, we attempted to simplify the image analysis pipeline of conventional CAD with deep learning techniques. Specifically, we introduced models of a deep belief network and a convolutional neural network in the context of nodule classification in computed tomography images. Two baseline methods with feature computing steps were implemented for comparison. The experimental results suggest that deep learning methods could achieve better discriminative results and hold promise in the CAD application domain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 393 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 16%
Researcher 45 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 10%
Other 14 4%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 109 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 97 24%
Engineering 65 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Physics and Astronomy 7 2%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 138 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,176,523
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#253
of 3,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,728
of 276,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#10
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.