↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic value of FDG PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s85479
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Dequanter, M Shahla, C Aubert, Y Deniz, P Lothaire

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) to identify the presence of cervical lymph nodes metastases and extracapsular spread with histologic correlations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The medical records of 54 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma before surgery were reviewed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to differentiate patients with cervical lymph node metastasis from those without lymph node metastasis. The same statistical analysis was done to differentiate cervical lymph nodes with extracapsular spread from those without extracapsular spread. Metastatic disease was diagnosed histologically in 49% (26 of 54) of the patients. Extracapsular spread was present in ten of the 54 patients (19%). When ROC curve analysis and maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) values were used to detect cervical lymph node metastasis, the area under the ROC curve was 0.96 and the optimal cutoff value for SUVmax was 4.05 based on ROC curve analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax for the detection of cervical lymph node metastasis using this cutoff point were 92% and 88%, respectively. When ROC curve analysis and SUVmax values were used in order to detect extracapsular spread, the area under the ROC curve was 0.86, and the optimal cutoff value for SUVmax was 4.15 based on ROC curve analysis. Using this cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax for the detection of extracapsular spread were 83% and 88%, respectively. In our study, a median (18)F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax cutoff value of 4.15 was found to be related with cervical lymph node metastasis and extracapsular spread in patients with head and neck cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Other 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 61%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#547
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,636
of 276,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#20
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.