↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning

Overview of attention for article published in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 742)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
897 Mendeley
Title
Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning
Published in
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s61654
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Chee Keng Lee, Hannah C Jordan, Jason Horsley

Abstract

There has been considerable work done in recent years exploring the value of urban green space for health and wellbeing. Urban green spaces provide environmental benefits through their effects on negating urban heat, offsetting greenhouse gas emissions, and attenuating storm water. They also have direct health benefits by providing urban residents spaces for physical activity and social interaction, and allowing psychological restoration to take place. Consequently, there is a real need to understand the mechanisms by which these benefits accrue. Previously, much of the focus has been on the characteristics of the urban green space that are likely to influence its use, such as its accessibility, quality, facilities, attractiveness, and security. This assumes a causal relationship, when in reality the relationship is more complex and multifactorial. It is more likely that it is the functionality of the green space, be it for exercise or sociocultural activities, rather than its character, which translates to the reported benefits. Challenges exist, such as competing urban planning priorities, economic considerations, and market forces. There is thus a need for urban planning to match the health benefits sought with the needs of the community and the functionality that the urban green space will serve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 897 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 892 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 140 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 13%
Student > Bachelor 114 13%
Researcher 87 10%
Student > Postgraduate 33 4%
Other 118 13%
Unknown 286 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 145 16%
Social Sciences 94 10%
Engineering 52 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 5%
Design 40 4%
Other 183 20%
Unknown 339 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#360,709
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#8
of 742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,984
of 279,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.