↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Social disparities among youth and the impact on their health

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Social disparities among youth and the impact on their health
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s64903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Kreatsoulas, Areej Hassan, SV Subramanian, Eric W Fleegler

Abstract

Social disparities among youth have been recognized as an important influence on disease risk later in the life cycle. Despite this, social problems are seldom assessed in a clinical setting. The primary objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of social disparities on the health of youth. A self-directed, web-based screening system was used to identify social disparities along seven social domains. Participants included youth, aged 15-24 years, recruited from an urban hospital clinic. The main outcome variable, self-rated health, was captured on a 5-point Likert scale. Univariable and multivariable regression models adjusted for sex, age, and race/ethnicity were implemented to assess the association between social problems and self-rated health. Correlation between social disparity problems was estimated using phi coefficient. Among 383 participants, 297 (78%) reported at least one social problem. The correlation among social disparity problems was low. Social disparities had an independent effect on self-rated health, and, in a fully adjusted model, disparities in health care access and food insecurity remained significant. The presence of even one social problem was associated with a decrease in overall health (β=0.68, P<0.01). There is a high burden of social disparities among our youth urban hospital population. The presence of even one social problem increases the risk of worsening self-rated health. Evaluating the social disparities among youth in the medical setting can help elucidate factors that negatively affect patients' health.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,616,072
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#77
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,069
of 271,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.