↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of bioavailability of krill oil versus fish oil and health effect

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 811)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of bioavailability of krill oil versus fish oil and health effect
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s85165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stine M Ulven, Kirsten B Holven

Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize the effects of krill oil (KO) or fish oil (FO) on eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) incorporation in plasma phospholipids or membrane of red blood cells (RBCs) as shown in human and animal studies. Furthermore, we discuss the findings in relation to the possible different health effects, focusing on lipids, inflammatory markers, cardiovascular disease risk, and biological functions of these two sources of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). A literature search was conducted in PubMed in January 2015. In total, 113 articles were identified, but based on selection criteria, 14 original papers were included in the review. Studies on bioavailability of EPA and DHA from KO and FO in humans and animals are limited and the interpretation is difficult, as different amounts of EPA and DHA have been used, duration of intervention differs, and different study groups have been included. Two human studies - one postprandial study and one intervention study - used the same amount of EPA and DHA from KO or FO, and they both showed that the bioavailability of EPA and DHA from KO seems to be higher than that from FO. Limited effects of KO and FO on lipids and inflammatory markers in human and animal studies were reported. Gene expression data from animal studies showed that FO upregulated the cholesterol synthesis pathway, which was the opposite of the effect mediated by KO. KO also regulated far more metabolic pathways than FO, which may indicate different biological effects of KO and FO. There seems to be a difference in bioavailability of EPA and DHA after intake of KO and FO, but more studies are needed before a firm conclusion can be made. It is also necessary to document the beneficial health effects of KO with more human studies and to elucidate if these effects differ from those after regular fish and FO intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 47 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 52 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#744,117
of 25,846,867 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#25
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,762
of 277,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,846,867 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.