↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for osteoarthritis: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for osteoarthritis: current perspectives
Published in
Stem cells and cloning advances and applications, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/sccaa.s68073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cody C Wyles, Matthew T Houdek, Atta Behfar, Rafael J Sierra

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful chronic condition with a significant impact on quality of life. The societal burden imposed by OA is increasing in parallel with the aging population; however, no therapies have demonstrated efficacy in preventing the progression of this degenerative joint disease. Current mainstays of therapy include activity modification, conservative pain management strategies, weight loss, and if necessary, replacement of the affected joint. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a multipotent endogenous population of progenitors capable of differentiation to musculoskeletal tissues. MSCs have a well-documented immunomodulatory role, managing the inflammatory response primarily through paracrine signaling. Given these properties, MSCs have been proposed as a potential regenerative cell therapy source for patients with OA. Research efforts are focused on determining the ideal source for derivation, as MSCs are native to several tissues. Furthermore, optimizing the mode of delivery remains a challenge both for appropriate localization of MSCs and for directed guidance toward stemming the local inflammatory process and initiating a regenerative response. Scaffolds and matrices with growth factor adjuvants may prove critical in this effort. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of MSC-based therapeutics for OA and discuss potential barriers that must be overcome for successful implementation of cell-based therapy as a routine treatment strategy in orthopedics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 18%
Student > Master 25 11%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Other 16 7%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 13%
Engineering 13 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,132,132
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#8
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,566
of 276,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem cells and cloning advances and applications
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.