Title |
Modern management for brain metastasis patients using stereotactic radiosurgery: literature review and the authors’ gamma knife treatment experiences
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s116718 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoshinori Higuchi, Masaaki Yamamoto, Toru Serizawa, Hitoshi Aiyama, Yasunori Sato, Bierta E Barfod |
Abstract |
Historically, whole brain radiotherapy was administered to most patients with brain metastases. However, over the past three decades, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), targeted at individual cranial lesions, has been accepted widely. In this study, based on the authors' experiences along with published data, recent trends in SRS for brain metastases are discussed. This article focuses on the following issues: 1) How many tumors can or should be treated with SRS? 2) Two-/three-staged SRS for relatively large tumors, 3) post- or preoperative SRS, and 4) repeat SRS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 30% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,982,872
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#949
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,176
of 328,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#40
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.