↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Neural correlates of eating disorders: translational potential

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Neural correlates of eating disorders: translational potential
Published in
Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/nan.s76699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carrie J McAdams, Whitney Smith

Abstract

Eating disorders are complex and serious psychiatric illnesses whose etiology includes psychological, biological, and social factors. Treatment of eating disorders is challenging as there are few evidence-based treatments and limited understanding of the mechanisms that result in sustained recovery. In the last 20 years, we have begun to identify neural pathways that are altered in eating disorders. Consideration of how these pathways may contribute to an eating disorder can provide an understanding of expected responses to treatments. Eating disorder behaviors include restrictive eating, compulsive overeating, and purging behaviors after eating. Eating disorders are associated with changes in many neural systems. In this targeted review, we focus on three cognitive processes associated with neurocircuitry differences in subjects with eating disorders such as reward, decision-making, and social behavior. We briefly examine how each of these systems function in healthy people, using Neurosynth meta-analysis to identify key regions commonly implicated in these circuits. We review the evidence for disruptions of these regions and systems in eating disorders. Finally, we describe psychiatric and psychological treatments that are likely to function by impacting these regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Neuroscience 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2017.
All research outputs
#13,662,605
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics
#15
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,512
of 268,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them