Title |
Influence of cationic lipid concentration on properties of lipid–polymer hybrid nanospheres for gene delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s87120 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rajendran JC Bose, Yoshie Arai, Jong Chan Ahn, Hansoo Park, Soo-Hong Lee |
Abstract |
Nanoparticles have been widely used for nonviral gene delivery. Recently, cationic hybrid nanoparticles consisting of two different materials were suggested as a promising delivery vehicle. In this study, nanospheres with a poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) core and cationic lipid shell were prepared, and the effect of cationic lipid concentrations on the properties of lipid polymer hybrid nanocarriers investigated. Lipid-polymer hybrid nanospheres (LPHNSs) were fabricated by the emulsion-solvent evaporation method using different concentrations of cationic lipids and characterized for size, surface charge, stability, plasmid DNA-binding capacity, cytotoxicity, and transfection efficiency. All LPHNSs had narrow size distribution with positive surface charges (ζ-potential 52-60 mV), and showed excellent plasmid DNA-binding capacity. In vitro cytotoxicity measurements with HEK293T, HeLa, HaCaT, and HepG2 cells also showed that LPHNSs exhibited less cytotoxicity than conventional transfection agents, such as Lipofectamine and polyethyleneimine-PLGA. As cationic lipid concentrations increased, the particle size of LPHNSs decreased while their ζ-potential increased. In addition, the in vitro transfection efficiency of LPHNSs increased as lipid concentration increased. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 166 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
Researcher | 8 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 2% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 126 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 127 | 76% |