↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Ocular manifestations and management recommendations of lysosomal storage disorders I: mucopolysaccharidoses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ocular manifestations and management recommendations of lysosomal storage disorders I: mucopolysaccharidoses
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/opth.s78368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlton R Fenzl, Kyla Teramoto, Majid Moshirfar

Abstract

The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage disorders caused by inborn errors of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) metabolism. These diseases are classified by enzyme deficiency into seven groups: type I, II, III, IV, VI, VII, and IX. GAG accumulation leads to characteristic clinical features. Some ophthalmic findings that are characteristic of MPS diseases include corneal clouding, retinal degeneration, decreased electroretinogram wave amplitude, optic atrophy, papilledema, and glaucoma. Current treatments such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and enzyme replacement therapy have increased the life span of many MPS patients and created the need to improve management of ocular symptoms. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of ocular manifestations and treatment options for the various types of MPS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#775
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,708
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#12
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.