↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Gender differences in the protective effects of green tea against amnestic mild cognitive impairment in the elderly Han population

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Gender differences in the protective effects of green tea against amnestic mild cognitive impairment in the elderly Han population
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s165618
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hua Xu, Yaping Wang, Yefeng Yuan, Xulai Zhang, Xiaoyun Zuo, Lijuan Cui, Ying Liu, Wei Chen, Ning Su, Haihong Wang, Feng Yan, Xia Li, Tao Wang, Shifu Xiao

Abstract

Gender differences may contribute to variances in the potential protective effects of tea against cognitive impairment in the elderly. To examine the association between different types of tea consumption and the risk of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) along gender lines. A cross-sectional study was conducted with reference to 20 communities in China. The sample population included elderly participants aged 60 years or older. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect each participant's general demographic information. Trained psychologists administrated the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to assess participants' cognitive function. An attending psychiatrist evaluated each participant's cognitive function. Finally, data from 2,131 participants were analyzed to assess the association. With regard to male participants, the percentage of green tea consumption was higher in the normal control group than in the aMCI group (X2=4.64, P=0.031). Logistic regression analysis showed that green tea consumption reduced the risk of aMCI in male participants (OR=0.657, P=0.019), and this finding was highly significant in males aged under 70 years (OR=0.376, P=0.002). Regarding female participants across every age group, the results indicated that tea consumption failed to significantly decrease the risk of aMCI (P>0.05). Unlike green tea, black tea and oolong tea were not correlated with a reduced risk of aMCI in terms of gender or age group. Multiple linear regression analysis also revealed that age, years of education, and green tea consumption (B=0.996, P=0.000) were associated with MoCA and MMSE scores, though only in male participants. Green tea consumption showed a protective effect against aMCI in males but not in females, particularly in males aged <70 years. However, black tea and oolong tea failed to show any protective effect in either males or females.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,368,410
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#468
of 3,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,273
of 341,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#10
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.