↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Biomimetics: forecasting the future of science, engineering, and medicine

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 4,122)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
Title
Biomimetics: forecasting the future of science, engineering, and medicine
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s83642
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jangsun Hwang, Yoon Jeong, Jeong Min Park, Kwan Hong Lee, Jong Wook Hong, Jonghoon Choi

Abstract

Biomimetics is the study of nature and natural phenomena to understand the principles of underlying mechanisms, to obtain ideas from nature, and to apply concepts that may benefit science, engineering, and medicine. Examples of biomimetic studies include fluid-drag reduction swimsuits inspired by the structure of shark's skin, velcro fasteners modeled on burrs, shape of airplanes developed from the look of birds, and stable building structures copied from the backbone of turban shells. In this article, we focus on the current research topics in biomimetics and discuss the potential of biomimetics in science, engineering, and medicine. Our report proposes to become a blueprint for accomplishments that can stem from biomimetics in the next 5 years as well as providing insight into their unseen limitations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 504 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 84 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 13%
Student > Master 64 13%
Researcher 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 77 15%
Unknown 151 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 93 18%
Materials Science 30 6%
Chemistry 30 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 6%
Other 119 23%
Unknown 180 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,235,006
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#41
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,476
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.