↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Mucosal versus muscle pain sensitivity in provoked vestibulodynia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Mucosal versus muscle pain sensitivity in provoked vestibulodynia
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s85705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Witzeman, Ruby HN Nguyen, Alisa Eanes, Sawsan As-Sanie, Denniz Zolnoun

Abstract

An estimated 8.3%-16% of women experience vulvovaginal discomfort during their lifetime. Frequently these patients report provoked pain on contact or with attempted intercourse, commonly referred to as provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Despite the burden of this condition, little is known about its potential etiologies including pelvic floor muscular dysfunction and mucosal components. This knowledge would be beneficial in developing targeted therapies including physical therapy. To explore the relative contribution of mucosal versus muscle pain sensitivity on pain report from intercourse among women with PVD. In this proof of concept study, 54 women with PVD underwent a structured examination assessing mucosal and pelvic muscle sensitivity. We examined three mucosal sites in the upper and lower vestibule. Patients were asked to rate their pain on cotton swab palpation of the mucosa using a 10-point visual analog scale. Muscle pain was assessed using transvaginal application of pressure on right and left puborectalis, and the perineal muscle complex. The Gracely pain scale (0-100) was used to assess the severity of pain with intercourse, with women rating the lowest, average, and highest pain levels; a 100 rating the highest level of pain. The lower vestibule's mucosa 5.81 (standard deviation =2.83) was significantly more sensitive than the upper vestibule 2.52 (standard deviation =2.6) (P<0.01) on exam. However, mucosal sensitivity was not associated with intercourse pain, while muscle sensitivity was moderately associated with both average and highest intensity of intercourse pain (r=-0.46, P=0.01 and r=-0.42, P=0.02), respectively. This preliminary study suggests that mucosal measures alone may not sufficiently capture the spectrum of clinical pain report in women with PVD, which is consistent with the empirical success of physical therapy in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 24%
Psychology 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#12,935,224
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#838
of 1,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,459
of 264,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.