↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The clinical usefulness of natural killer cell activity in patients with suspected or diagnosed prostate cancer: an observational cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The clinical usefulness of natural killer cell activity in patients with suspected or diagnosed prostate cancer: an observational cross-sectional study
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/ott.s169094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wan Song, Ji Woong Yu, Byong Chang Jeong, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee, Han Yong Choi, Eun-Suk Kang, Hwang Gyun Jeon

Abstract

To investigate the clinical usefulness of natural killer cell activity (NKA) for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and prediction of Gleason grade. We prospectively enrolled 221 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for suspected PCa due to elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >2.5 ng/mL or abnormal findings on digital rectal examination (n=146), or who were diagnosed with PCa (n=75) between 2016 and 2017. The NKA was compared according to PCa and Gleason grade. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate associations among NKA, PCa, and Gleason grade, and expressed using distribution dot plots. The absolute risk and relative risk of PCa, and odds ratios at different cut-off values of NKA were calculated. Of the total 221 patients, PCa was identified in 135 (61.9%) patients. When patients were divided according to PCa, there was no significant difference in NKA (1,267.6 vs 1,198.9 pg/mL, P=0.491). Furthermore, in 135 patients with PCa, the NKA was not significantly different according to Gleason grade (P=0.893). These results were not changed when confined to the patients with PSA between 2.5 and 10.0 ng/mL (P=0.654 and P=0.672, respectively). In addition, there was no significant difference in the risk of PCa at different cut-off values of NKA. These results indicate that NKA does not appear to be very useful for detection of PCa and prediction of Gleason grade. Further large multi-institutional studies are required to verify the role of NKA in PCa detection and Gleason grade prediction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Unspecified 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#889
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,229
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#35
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.