↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluating the use of corticosteroids in preventing and treating bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the use of corticosteroids in preventing and treating bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s158184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oreoluwa Olaloko, Raihan Mohammed, Utkarsh Ojha

Abstract

Approximately 15 million babies worldwide are born premature, and complications of prematurity are one of the leading causes of death in neonates. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) are two of the most common and serious consequences of prematurity. Synthetic corticosteroids, including dexamethasone, have been central in efforts to treat and prevent BPD. There is strong evidence to show that prenatal corticosteroids reduce infant mortality and the incidence of NRDS, leading to their widespread use in obstetric units. However, data suggest that they are not as effective in reducing the incidence of BPD as NRDS, which may be due to the multifactorial pathogenesis of BPD. On the other hand, the use of postnatal corticosteroids in preterm infants is much more controversial. They have been shown to improve lung function and help in reducing the need for mechanical ventilation. These benefits, however, are associated with a range of adverse short- and long-term effects. This review will discuss the benefits and consequences of corticosteroids in treating BPD and will examine alternative treatments and future research that may improve the understanding of BPD and inform clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,421,028
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#517
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,263
of 328,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.