↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Are there efficacious treatments for treating the fatigue–sleep disturbance–depression symptom cluster in breast cancer patients? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL©)

Overview of attention for article published in Breast cancer targets and therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Are there efficacious treatments for treating the fatigue–sleep disturbance–depression symptom cluster in breast cancer patients? A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL©)
Published in
Breast cancer targets and therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/bctt.s25014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shamini Jain, Courtney Boyd, Lavinia Fiorentino, Raheleh Khorsan, Cindy Crawford

Abstract

While fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depression often co-occur in breast cancer patients, treatment efficacy for this symptom cluster is unknown. A systematic review was conducted to determine whether there are specific interventions (ie, medical, pharmacological, behavioral, psychological, and complementary medicine approaches) that are effective in mitigating the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster in breast cancer patients, using the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL(©)) process. Peer-reviewed literature was searched across multiple databases; from database inception - October 2011, using keywords pre-identified to capture randomized controlled trials (RCT) relevant to the research question. Methodological bias was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 50 checklist. Confidence in the estimate of effect and assessment of safety were also evaluated across the categories of included interventions via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. The initial search yielded 531 citations, of which 41 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, twelve RCTs reported on all three symptoms, and eight of these were able to be included in the GRADE analysis. The remaining 29 RCTs reported on two symptoms. Studies were of mixed quality and many were underpowered. Overall, results suggest that there is: 1) promising evidence for the effectiveness of various treatment types in mitigating sleep disturbance in breast cancer patients; 2) mixed evidence for fatigue; 3) little evidence for treating depression; and 4) no clear evidence that treatment of one symptom results in effective treatment for other symptoms. More high-quality studies are needed to determine the impact of varied treatments in mitigating the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we encourage future studies to examine the psychometric and clinical validity of the hypothesized relationship between the symptoms in the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 10 14%
Librarian 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Psychology 8 11%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#110
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,706
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.