↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical efficacy of calcitonin compared to diclofenac sodium in chronic nonspecific low back pain with type I Modic changes: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Clinical efficacy of calcitonin compared to diclofenac sodium in chronic nonspecific low back pain with type I Modic changes: a retrospective study
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s158718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaming Zhou, Tengshuai Li, Liandong Li, Yuan Xue

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of calcitonin with diclofenac sodium in the treatment of patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP) and type I Modic changes (MC1). The study was a retrospective observational study with 109 patients who had nonspecific LBP and MC1 that appeared as bone marrow lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Between October 2013 and March 2016, 62 patients were injected intramuscularly with calcitonin 50 IU once daily and 47 patients were treated with diclofenac 75 mg once per day for 4 weeks for the treatment of LBP associated with MC1 on MRI. Visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (0-100) questionnaires were acquired from clinical records to evaluate LBP perception and degree of disability. Imaging data were also collected before and after treatment. Significant improvements were found in VAS and ODI at posttreatment compared with baseline in both groups (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, there was a significant difference between calcitonin group and diclofenac group at both 4 weeks and 3 months of follow-up (4 weeks: VAS 4.46 ± 1.58 vs 5.08 ± 1.50, ODI 20.32 ± 9.64 vs 24.35 ± 7.95; 3 months: VAS 3.70 ± 1.74 vs 4.51 ± 1.67, ODI 16.67 ± 9.04 vs 21.18 ± 9.56; P < 0.05 for all). Moreover, the proportion of patients with a significant change in LBP scales was higher in the calcitonin group (4 weeks: VAS 50.00% vs 23.40%, ODI 54.83% vs 25.53%; 3 months: VAS 58.06% vs 38.29%, ODI 59.67% vs 38.29%; P < 0.05 for all). According to MRI, 43.54% patients in the calcitonin group showed improvement compared with 21.27% patients in the diclofenac group (P < 0.05). There was greater short-term efficacy of calcitonin compared with diclofenac in patients with LBP and MC1 on MRI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,242,890
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#450
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,107
of 328,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.