↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimal management of dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 188)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Optimal management of dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , September 2015
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s60821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiyuki Yamamoto

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthropathy associated with cutaneous psoriasis, which is currently classified as a seronegative spondyloarthropathy. The presence of cutaneous psoriasis is important for correct and early diagnosis of PsA, because the onset of cutaneous lesions usually precedes the appearance of joint manifestation. Thus, dermatologists are able to detect the condition at its inception. PsA has several unique characteristics such as enthesopathy, dactylitis, and abnormal bone remodeling. In particular, dactylitis occurs on the easily observed sites such as digits, and is thus a significant indicator of PsA. It is important to observe not only the fingers but also the toes, because dactylitis involves both digits of the hands and feet. Recently, new ideas regarding the involvement of the interleukin (IL)-23/Th17 axis have emerged, and the dramatic effects of targeting therapies have highlighted the physiological roles of key cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-17A, and IL-23 in psoriasis. As recent insights are shedding light on the pathogenesis of PsA, understanding of the pathogenesis of dactylitis and enthesitis are also progressing. In this article, current views on the optimal management of dactylitis are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,171,805
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#13
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,820
of 277,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them