↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Combination of Bcl-2 and MYC protein expression improves high-risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Combination of Bcl-2 and MYC protein expression improves high-risk stratification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s86093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Wang, Min Zhou, Jing-Yan Xu, Bing Chen, Jian Ouyang

Abstract

To evaluate whether the addition of two biological markers (MYC and BCL-2 protein overexpression) improves the stratification of high-risk patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Seven risk factors were identified at diagnosis, and a maximum of 7 points were assigned to each patient. The patients were classified according to four risk groups: low (0-1), low-intermediate (2-3), high-intermediate (4), and high (5-7). Only high-risk patients with DLBCL were included in this analysis. We retrospectively examined 20 cases from 2008 to 2013 at the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. The median expression of MYC protein was 60%, and 17 of 20 (65%) evaluable cases overexpressed MYC. The median expression of BCL-2 protein was also 60%. Eighteen of 20 (90%) evaluable cases showed BCL-2 overexpression. Additionally, 12 out of 20 cases (60%) demonstrated coexpression of MYC and BCL-2 proteins. The percentages of overall survival and progression-free survival at the median follow-up time (36 months) were 33.3%±16.1% and 16.9%±13.5%, respectively. By comparison, nine, four, and 20 patients were classified as high risk based on the International Prognostic Index (IPI), National Comprehensive Cancer Network(NCCN)-IPI, and revised IPI criteria, respectively. According to the IPI and NCCN-IPI stratification, the risk groups demonstrated closely overlapping survival curves. In addition, four out of 20 cases were identified as low-intermediate risk according to the NCCN-IPI criteria. The addition of MYC and BCL-2 protein expression to the IPI could identify a subset of DLBCL patients with high-risk clinicopathological characteristics and poor clinical outcome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Materials Science 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,347,611
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,027
of 2,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,587
of 266,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#31
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.