↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Time for a new language for asthma control: results from REALISE Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asthma and Allergy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 452)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Time for a new language for asthma control: results from REALISE Asia
Published in
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/jaa.s82633
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Price, Aileen David-Wang, Sang-Heon Cho, James Chung-Man Ho, Jae-Won Jeong, Chong-Kin Liam, Jiangtao Lin, Abdul Razak Muttalif, Diahn-Warng Perng, Tze-Lee Tan, Faisal Yunus, Glenn Neira

Abstract

Asthma is a global health problem, and asthma prevalence in Asia is increasing. The REcognise Asthma and LInk to Symptoms and Experience Asia study assessed patients' perception of asthma control and attitudes toward treatment in an accessible, real-life adult Asian population. An online survey of 2,467 patients with asthma from eight Asian countries/regions, aged 18-50 years, showed greater than or equal to two prescriptions in previous 2 years and access to social media. Patients were asked about their asthma symptoms, exacerbations and treatment type, views and perceptions of asthma control, attitudes toward asthma management, and sources of asthma information. Patients had a mean age of 34.2 (±7.4) years and were diagnosed with asthma for 12.5 (±9.7) years. Half had the Global Initiative for Asthma-defined uncontrolled asthma. During the previous year, 38% of patients visited the emergency department, 33% were hospitalized, and 73% had greater than or equal to one course of oral corticosteroids. About 90% of patients felt that their asthma was under control, 82% considered their condition as not serious, and 59% were concerned about their condition. In all, 66% of patients viewed asthma control as managing attacks and 24% saw it as an absence of or minimal symptoms. About 14% of patients who correctly identified their controller inhalers had controlled asthma compared to 6% who could not. Patients consistently overestimated their level of asthma control contrary to what their symptoms suggest. They perceived control as management of exacerbations, reflective of a crisis-oriented mind-set. Interventions can leverage on patients' trust in health care providers and desire for self-management via a new language to generate a paradigm shift toward symptom control and preventive care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 79 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,193,157
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#49
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,001
of 266,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them