↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evaluation of selected ultrasound features of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance for the Bethesda reporting system for thyroid…

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of selected ultrasound features of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance for the Bethesda reporting system for thyroid cytology
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s168409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krzysztof Kaliszewski, Dorota Diakowska, Beata Wojtczak, Zdzisław Forkasiewicz

Abstract

The risk of malignancy from "atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (AUS/FLUS) is estimated to lie between 5% and 15%; however, some authors suggest that the risk of malignancy in AUS/FLUS depends upon specific clinical situations. This was a retrospective study which aimed to determine the incidence and risk of thyroid cancer (TC) based upon selected ultrasound features from patients with thyroid nodules (TN) classified as AUS/FLUS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant associations between ultrasound features and the risk of TC. Of 127 patients with TN classified as AUS/FLUS who underwent thyroidectomy, 114 (89.8%) had benign disease while 13 (10.2%) had TC. Univariate analysis identified several significant predictors for TC (all p<0.05), including microcalcifications, hypoechogenicity, the prevalence of irregular margins, a taller rather than a wide form, high vascularity, and fast tumor growth. Multivariate analysis further showed that microcalcifications (odds ratio =21.37; p=0.024) and fast growth (odds ratio =22.70; p=0.021) were significant and independent factors associated with the risk of developing TC. Microcalcifications and fast growth of the TN could therefore be used as predictive factors for the development of TC in patients with AUS/FLUS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,386,534
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#461
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,734
of 328,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#22
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.