↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Public health policies to encourage healthy eating habits: recent perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 132)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
Title
Public health policies to encourage healthy eating habits: recent perspectives
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s69188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary T Gorski, Christina A Roberto

Abstract

There is an urgent need to address unhealthy dietary patterns at the population level. Poor diet and physical inactivity are key drivers of the obesity pandemic, and they are among the leading causes of preventable death and disability in nearly every country in the world. As countries grapple with the growing obesity prevalence, many innovative policy options to reduce overeating and improve diet quality remain largely unexplored. We describe recent trends in eating habits and consequences for public health, vulnerabilities to unhealthy eating, and the role for public health policies. We reviewed recent public health policies to promote healthier diet patterns, including mandates, restrictions, economic incentives, marketing limits, information provision, and environmental defaults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 304 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 20%
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Researcher 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 4%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 125 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 47 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 11%
Social Sciences 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 136 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,711,147
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#38
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,236
of 273,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.