↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Longitudinal qualitative evaluation of pharmacist integration into the urgent care setting

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 111)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Longitudinal qualitative evaluation of pharmacist integration into the urgent care setting
Published in
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/iprp.s168471
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Wright, Richard J Adams, Jeanette Blacklock, Sarah A Corlett, Rebecca Harmston, Margaret McWilliams, Stephen-Andrew Whyte, Gail Fleming

Abstract

To describe the most effective model for managing, educating, and training pharmacist advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) in the urgent care center (UCC) setting, role evolution and how to measure their effectiveness. Ethical approval was obtained to perform a qualitative longitudinal cohort study in three sites, with three pharmacists in each trained as ACPs from 2016 to 2017. ACP role, location, management, mentorship, and supervision were locally determined. ACPs attended focus groups (FGs) at 1 and 3 months (sites 1-3), 6 and 12 months (site 1 only), and the UCC staff were interviewed once with a topic guide regarding training, integration, role, and impact. Verbatim transcriptions were analyzed thematically. Eight ACP FGs and 24 stakeholder interviews produced major themes of communication, management, education and training, role, and outcomes. Effective education, training, and integration required communication of role to address concerns regarding salary differentials, supportive management structure, and multi-professional learning. ACPs reported that the model of workplace training, experiential learning, and university-based education was appropriate. Training was better located in the minor injuries and general practitioner areas. Recommended measures of effectiveness included patient satisfaction and workload transfer. The education and training model was appropriate. Communication and management require careful consideration to ensure effective integration and role development. Pharmacists were better located initially in the minor illness rather than major trauma areas. Quality of patient experience resulting from the new role was important in addition to reassurance that the role represented a positive contribution to workload.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,370,446
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
#15
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,595
of 342,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them