↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and vinorelbine for pretreated non-small- cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and vinorelbine for pretreated non-small- cell lung cancer: a retrospective study
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s89655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seigo Minami, Yoshitaka Ogata, Suguru Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Komuta

Abstract

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) eventually progresses after first-line chemotherapy, and usually requires salvage treatment. Although neither gemcitabine nor vinorelbine is approved as a candidate drug in the second- or further-line for NSCLC, they can be alternative drugs in terms of anti-tumor effects and toxicities. Actually, in our institution, we often use a combination of these two anti-tumor drugs in our daily practice. We retrospectively reviewed 85 patients with advanced NSCLC who had received combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and vinorelbine after a platinum-based regimen from June 2007 to June 2014 in Osaka Police Hospital, and performed Cox proportional hazard analyses in order to detect predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Patient characteristics included a mean age of 65.5 years, 56 males, 54 adenocarcinoma, 53 European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Thirteen and 35 patients received the study treatment as the second- and third-line treatment, respectively. The overall response rate, disease control rate, PFS, and overall survival were 4.7% (95% confidence interval 1.3%-11.6%), 30.6% (21.0%-41.5%), 2.1 months (1.7-2.8 months), and 6.9 months (5.0-11.0 months). Twenty-one and six patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, respectively. European Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0-1 was detected as a factor predicting longer PFS by univariate (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.08; P<0.001) and multivariate (1.65, 1.27-2.14, P<0.001) analyses. This combination was ineffective and harmful to pretreated patients with NSCLC. We do not recommend this regimen as a later-line treatment option.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#92
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,780
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.