↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Expert opinion on the applicability of dyslipidemia guidelines in Asia and the Middle East

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Expert opinion on the applicability of dyslipidemia guidelines in Asia and the Middle East
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s160555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mostafa Alshamiri, Mahmood Mohammed Ali Ghanaim, Philip Barter, Kuan-Cheng Chang, Jian-Jun Li, Bien J Matawaran, Anwar Santoso, Sameh Shaheen, Ketut Suastika, Nuntakorn Thongtang, Ahmad KM Yusof

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a growing burden across the world. In Asia and the Middle East, in particular, CVD is among the most prevalent and debilitating diseases. Dyslipidemia is an important factor in the development of atherosclerosis and associated cardiovascular events, and so effective management strategies are critical to reducing overall cardiovascular risk. Multiple dyslipidemia guidelines have been developed by international bodies such as the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, which all have similarities in practice recommendations for the optimal management of dyslipidemia. However, they differ in certain aspects including pharmacological treatment, lifestyle modification and the target levels used for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The evidence behind these guidelines is generally based on data from Western populations, and their applicability to people in Asia and the Middle East is largely untested. As a result, practitioners within Asia and the Middle East continue to rely on international evidence despite population differences in lipid phenotypes and CVD risk factors. An expert panel was convened to review the international guidelines commonly used in Asia and the Middle East and determine their applicability to clinical practice in the region, with specific recommendations, or considerations, provided where current guideline recommendations differ from local practice. Herein, we describe the heterogeneous approaches and application of current guidelines used to manage dyslipidemia in Asia and the Middle East. We provide consensus management recommendations to cover different patient scenarios, including primary prevention, elderly, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, documented CVD, acute coronary syndromes and family history of ischemic heart disease. Moreover, we advocate for countries within the Asian and Middle East regions to continue to develop guidelines that are appropriate for the local population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 58 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 62 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,529,173
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#1,160
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,605
of 328,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.