↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: so-called psychiatric comorbidity and underlying defense mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: so-called psychiatric comorbidity and underlying defense mechanisms
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s82079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimiliano Beghi, Paola Beffa Negrini, Cecilia Perin, Federica Peroni, Adriana Magaudda, Cesare Cerri, Cesare Maria Cornaggia

Abstract

In Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) do not have a unique classification as they can be found within different categories: conversion, dissociative, and somatization disorders. The ICD-10, instead, considers PNES within dissociative disorders, merging the dissociative disorders and conversion disorders, although the underlying defense mechanisms are different. The literature data show that PNES are associated with cluster B (mainly borderline) personality disorders and/or to people with depressive or anxiety disorders. Defense mechanisms in patients with PNES with a prevalence of anxious/depressive symptoms are of "neurotic" type; their goal is to lead to a "split", either vertical (dissociation) or horizontal (repression). The majority of patients with this type of PNES have alexithymia traits, meaning that they had difficulties in feeling or perceiving emotions. In subjects where PNES are associated with a borderline personality, in which the symbolic function is lost, the defense mechanisms are of a more archaic nature (denial). PNES with different underlying defense mechanisms have different prognoses (despite similar severity of PNES) and need usually a different treatment (pharmacological or psychological). Thus, it appears superfluous to talk about psychiatric comorbidity, since PNES are a different symptomatic expression of specific psychiatric disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 8 8%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 26 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Psychology 26 26%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,152
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,841
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#35
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.