↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

P–TNM staging system for colon cancer: combination of P-stage and AJCC TNM staging system for improving prognostic prediction and clinical management

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
P–TNM staging system for colon cancer: combination of P-stage and AJCC TNM staging system for improving prognostic prediction and clinical management
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s165188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qi Liu, Dakui Luo, Sanjun Cai, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li

Abstract

This study focused on improving the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system and demonstrated an improvement in prognostic accuracy and clinical management of colon cancer using the P-TNM staging system. Eligible patients (N=56,800) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. The P-stage (P0 or P1) was assigned to each patient based on age at diagnosis, tumor grade, and tumor size. The outcome of interest was cancer-specific survival (CSS). The Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors and analyze the CSS probabilities of patients with colon cancer having different P-TNM stages, respectively. A total of 29,627 patients were assigned to P0-stage and 27,173 patients were assigned to P1-stage. The P1-stage was associated with a 98.1% increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio =1.981, 95% confidence interval =1.891-2.076, P<0.001), which was higher in patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer. The P1-stage patients had improvement in CSS compared with those in P0-stage in respective stages (P<0.001). Moreover, CSS decreased in stage I-P1 compared with stage IIA-P0 or IIIA-P0 (P<0.001), stage IIIA-P1 compared with stage IIA-P0 (P<0.001), stage IIB-P1 compared with stage IIIB-P0 or IIC-P0 (P<0.001), stage IIIB-P1 compared with stage IIC-P0 (P<0.001), and stage IIC-P1 compared with stage IIIC-P0 (P<0.001). P-stage was an independent prognostic factor for colon cancer. This study strongly supported the incorporation of P-stage into the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for a better approach to prognostication and, thus, more individualized risk-adaptive therapies in colon cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Engineering 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 19 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,805,293
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,061
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,137
of 328,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#45
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.