↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

How much further for the sub-2-hour marathon?

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
How much further for the sub-2-hour marathon?
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s169758
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caio Victor Sousa, Marcelo Magalhães Sales, Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis, Thomas Rosemann, Beat Knechtle

Abstract

The sub-2-hour marathon is a new barrier in endurance running performance, and it has been widely debated in the scientific community. In this review we present a mathematical model to estimate the possible year when a male could break through the sub-2-hour barrier, and also an estimation of when a female could break Paula Radcliffe's marathon running record. Further, we present several aspects (ie, physiology, nationality, age, biomechanics, pacing, and drafting) that are associated with marathon running performance in elite runners and, finally, the possible characteristics of the male to break the sub-2-hour barrier. In summary, with the results of the developed equations, it is possible that a male athlete can break through the sub-2-hour barrier in the next decade (with Nike® Breaking2 performance 1920-2018 [NBP]: y =0.0417x2-14.18x +3,128; year of 2026; without NBP 1920-2018: y =0.045x2-15.12x +3,194; year of 2027). This marathoner will possibly have a maximal oxygen uptake >85 mL∙kg-1∙min-1 and should perform the race at a pacing higher than 85% of maximal oxygen uptake. In addition, this runner should pay more attention to strength training, endurance strength, speed training, and focus on running training at an intensity above the anaerobic threshold. Most likely, this runner originates from East Africa (especially from Ethiopia) and will have an age of ~27 years. For the females, there is poor evidence regarding the physiological profile of the female marathoner who will break Radcliffe's record, but the available literature suggests that it will not happen any time soon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 25 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,082,690
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#66
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,894
of 342,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.