↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A pharmacogenomic prospective randomized controlled trial of CYP2B6 polymorphisms and efavirenz dose adjustment among HIV-infected Thai patients: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
A pharmacogenomic prospective randomized controlled trial of CYP2B6 polymorphisms and efavirenz dose adjustment among HIV-infected Thai patients: a pilot study
Published in
Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/pgpm.s86446
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pansachee Damronglerd, Chonlaphat Sukasem, Wilawan Thipmontree, Apichaya Puangpetch, Sasisopin Kiertiburanakul

Abstract

We aimed at comparing clinical/immunological outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who were treated with CYP2B6-guided and conventional efavirenz (EFV) therapy. This study was a 24-week prospective randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were HIV-infected adults yet to start antiretroviral therapy. Twenty-four HIV-infected patients were recruited and randomly assigned to genotype CYP2B6 polymorphism before ART initial dose. Patients with CYP2B6 *6/*6 received 400 mg EFV-based regimen and those with other genotypes received 600 mg EFV-based therapy. For CYP2B6 polymorphism, 12 patients were extensive metabolizers, ten patients were intermediate metabolizers, and only two patients were poor metabolizers (*6/*6). The overall mean EFV plasma concentrations were similar in both groups. The mean drug concentrations (standard deviation) were 1.675 (0.963), 1.445 (0.778), and 1.899 (0.808) µg/mL at week 4, 12, and 24, respectively. The CYP2B6 *6/*6 patient who received low dose of EFV had lower mean EFV level than those who received a normal dose, 1.916 versus 3.915 µg/mL (P<0.001), respectively. Seventy percent of the patients had neuropsychiatric adverse events, especially dizziness. There was a trend toward association of the CYP2B6 polymorphism and plasma EFV concentrations in this study. Reduced EFV dose should be considered in CYPB6 *6/*6 carrier to keep the drug concentration in therapeutic range.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,247,404
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,571
of 287,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them