↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Risk of cancer in patients with thyroid disease and venous thromboembolism

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Risk of cancer in patients with thyroid disease and venous thromboembolism
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/clep.s158869
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana H Christensen, Katalin Veres, Anne G Ording, Jens Otto L Jørgensen, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Reimar W Thomsen, Henrik T Sørensen

Abstract

Risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in patients with hypo/hyperthyroidism. It is unknown whether VTE may be a presenting symptom of occult cancer in these patients. Nationwide population-based cohort study based on Danish medical registry data. We identified all patients diagnosed with VTE during 1978-2013 who had a previous or concurrent diagnosis of hypothyroidism (N=1481) or hyperthyroidism (N=1788). We followed them until a first-time cancer diagnosis, death, emigration, or study end, whichever came first. We calculated 1-year absolute cancer risk and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for cancer incidence in the study population compared with national cancer incidence in the general population. During the first year after a VTE diagnosis, the 1-year absolute cancer risk was 3.0% among patients with hypothyroidism and 3.9% among those with hyperthyroidism. During the first year of follow-up, SIRs for cancer in the study population compared with the general population were 1.96 (95% CI: 1.42-2.64) among patients with hypothyroidism and 2.67 (95% CI: 2.07-3.39) among those with hyperthyroidism. SIRs declined substantially after 1 year but remained increased during the remainder of the follow-up period (up to 36 years) (SIR for hypothyroidism=1.16 [95% CI: 0.97-1.39]; SIR for hyperthyroidism=1.26 [95% CI: 1.08-1.46]). VTE may be a marker of underlying occult cancer in patients with hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Psychology 2 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,517,423
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#253
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,563
of 331,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.