The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Bioinformatic analysis of four miRNAs relevant to metastasis-regulated processes in endometrial carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s168594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lingping Zhu, Zhiqun Shu, Xiaoming Sun |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression of different miRNAs in nonmetastatic and metastatic endometrial cancer Existing evidence indicates that there are many factors affecting the metastasis of endometrial cancer, and miRNAs play an unique role in many processes of endometiral cancer. miRNA sequences were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project database, and Bioinformatics technique was used to deal with those data. We elucidated the relation between differentially expressed miRNAs and clinical information for a total of 260 tumor tissues and 22 tumor tissues that had metastasized. We used the threshold of P <0.05| log 2 FC | >1.2 to identify potential miRNAs. Four differentially expressed miRNAs were identified in nonmetastatic and metastatic endometrial cancers. Further differential analysis of metastatic tissue revealed that miR-1247 is associated with metastasis of endometrial cancer to the lung, and miR-3200 is associated with the clinical stage of endometrial cancer. A functional enrichment analysis showed that the four miRNAs may be involved in multiple pathways of cancer, including the Wnt, NOTCH, and TGF-β signaling pathways and signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells. Protein-protein interaction analysis showed that PAK6, SNAP25, MAN1A1, MYB, ZBTB4, UST, ALDH1A3, and NRP2 are hub genes of relevant miRNAs in endometrial cancers. The current study indicates that these four miRNAs may be related to molecular markers of metastasis of endometrial cancer. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 3 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#16,508,188
of 26,492,979 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#617
of 2,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,292
of 345,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#29
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,492,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.