↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of percutaneous intradiscal ozone injection with laser disc decompression in discogenic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of percutaneous intradiscal ozone injection with laser disc decompression in discogenic low back pain
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s164335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Poupak Rahimzadeh, Farnad Imani, Mohammad Ghahremani, Seyed Hamid Reza Faiz

Abstract

Intervertebral disc herniation with the pressure on the surrounding neural structures is one of the most important causes of chronic low back pain, which sometimes leads to open surgery. Reducing the pressure inside the disc with intradiscal intervention such as laser irradiation or ozone injection is a minimally invasive method and an alternative to surgery with satisfactory results. These two methods were compared with each other in this research. In this clinical trial, 40 patients with back pain radiating to lower limb due to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were selected. These patients were randomly divided into two equal groups for percutaneous intradiscal intervention. The Laser Disc Decompression Group (LDG) (n=20) was exposed to 1500 J of laser irradiation into the disc center. In the Ozone Injection Group (OZG) patients (n=20), 6 mL of ozone 30 µg/mL was injected into the center of the disc. Considering the level of neural root involvement, both groups received 20 mg of triamcinolone injection via transforaminal epidural. Patients were followed up for 12 months regarding score on visual analogue scale and life performance improvement based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and satisfaction level. According to the results, no difference was found between the two groups for ODI variable before intervention, whereas OZG showed better ODI scores in the measured time intervals. In LDG, only a significant difference in terms of ODI score was found between the times of before surgery and the first month. Intradiscal ozone injection could be an effective and cost-effective method for treatment of patients with discogenic back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 13 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,071,205
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#836
of 1,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,507
of 329,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#24
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.