↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cytological and cytometric analysis of oral mucosa in patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Cytological and cytometric analysis of oral mucosa in patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s157731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hatice Kose Ozlece, Gulname Findik Guvendi, Nergiz Huseyinoglu, Yusuf Ehi, Yuksel Kivrak

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are the two most common neurodegenerative diseases. Recent studies have sought to identify precursor symptoms of AD and PD that occur before the onset of the disease. We evaluated changes in the oral mucosa of patients with AD and PD using a stereological method. The study included 29 patients with AD, 30 patients with idiopathic PD, and 30 healthy volunteers. Brush biopsies were obtained from all participants, and the nucleator method was used to estimate the volume of cells obtained from the buccal mucosa. Cytomorphometric analysis revealed that the nuclear volume was 484.39±117.10 µm3 in the AD group, 509.71±132.26 µm3 in PD patients, and 509.30±100.21 µm3 in the control group. The cytoplasmic volume was 115,456.60±30,664.98 µm3 in the AD group, 103,097.93±25,034.65 µm3 in PD patients, and 109,528.45±28,381.43 µm3 in the control group. The nuclear and cytoplasmic volumes were not significantly different among groups (P>0.05). The cytomorphometric analysis revealed no significant differences in the cytoplasmic and nuclear volumes of buccal cells obtained from patients with AD and PD and healthy volunteers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,762,265
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#643
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,308
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.