↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Systematic review and meta-analysis: bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Systematic review and meta-analysis: bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s92041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Yin, Jingjing Li, Yujing Xia, Rong Zhang, Jianrong Wang, Wenxia Lu, Yuqing Zhou, Yuanyuan Zheng, Huerxidan Abudumijiti, Rongxia Chen, Kan Chen, Sainan Li, Tong Liu, Fan Wang, Jie Lu, Yingqun Zhou, Chuanyong Guo

Abstract

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but not all cases respond well. Evidence has shown that combination therapy of UDCA with bezafibrate significantly improved liver function. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of UDCA and bezafibrate combination therapy in the treatment of PBC. Nine trials, with a total of 269 patients, were included in the analysis. The bias risk of these trials was high. Compared with UDCA alone, the combination with bezafibrate improved the Mayo risk score (mean difference [MD], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.95; P=0.0008) and liver biochemistry: alkaline phosphatase (MD, -238.21 IU/L; 95% CI, -280.83 to -195.60; P<0.00001); gamma-glutamyltransferase (MD, -38.23 IU/L; 95% CI, -50.16 to -25.85; P<0.00001); immunoglobulin M (MD, -128.63 IU/L; 95% CI, -151.55 to -105.71; P<0.00001); bilirubin (MD, -0.20 mg/dL; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.07; P=0.002); triglycerides (MD, -26.84 mg/dL; 95% CI, -36.51 to -17.17; P<0.0001); total cholesterol (MD, -21.58 mg/dL; 95% CI, -30.81 to -12.34; P<0.0001), and serum alanine aminotransferase (MD, -10.24 IU/L; 95% CI, -12.65 to -78.5; P<0.00001). However, combination therapy showed no significant differences in the incidence of all-cause mortality or pruritus, and may have resulted in more adverse events (risk ratio [RR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.07-0.67; P=0.008). Combination therapy improved liver biochemistry and the prognosis of PBC, but did not improve clinical symptoms or incidence of death. Attention should be paid to adverse events when using bezafibrate.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#580
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,707
of 276,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#31
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.