↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A proposal for an individualized pharmacogenetic-guided isoniazid dosage regimen for patients with tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
A proposal for an individualized pharmacogenetic-guided isoniazid dosage regimen for patients with tuberculosis
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s87131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Ah Jung, Tae-Eun Kim, Hyun Lee, Byeong-Ho Jeong, Hye Yun Park, Kyeongman Jeon, O Jung Kwon, Jae-Wook Ko, Rihwa Choi, Hye-In Woo, Won-Jung Koh, Soo-Youn Lee

Abstract

Isoniazid (INH) is an essential component of first-line anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment. However, treatment with INH is complicated by polymorphisms in the expression of the enzyme system primarily responsible for its elimination, N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2), and its associated hepatotoxicity. The objective of this study was to develop an individualized INH dosing regimen using a pharmacogenetic-driven model and to apply this regimen in a pilot study. A total of 206 patients with TB who received anti-TB treatment were included in this prospective study. The 2-hour post-dose concentrations of INH were obtained, and their NAT2 genotype was determined using polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. A multivariate regression analysis that included the variables of age, sex, body weight, and NAT2 genotype was performed to determine the best model for estimating the INH dose that achieves a concentration of 3.0-6.0 mg/L. This dosing algorithm was then used for newly enrolled 53 patients. Serum concentrations of INH were significantly lower in the rapid-acetylators than in the slow-acetylators (2.55 mg/L vs 6.78 mg/L, median, P<0.001). A multivariate stepwise linear regression analysis revealed that NAT2 and body weight independently affected INH concentrations: INH concentration (mg/L) =13.821-0.1× (body weight, kg) -2.273× (number of high activity alleles of NAT2; 0, 1, 2). In 53 newly enrolled patients, the frequency at which they were within the therapeutic range of 3.0-6.0 mg/L was higher in the model-based treatment group compared to the standard treatment group (80.8% vs 59.3%). The use of individualized pharmacogenetic-guided INH dosage regimens that incorporate NAT2 genotype and body weight may help to ensure achievement of therapeutic concentrations of INH in the TB patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 7 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 35 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#925
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,242
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#52
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.