↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The predictive effect of overexpressed miR-34a on good survival of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The predictive effect of overexpressed miR-34a on good survival of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s84043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Wang, Guorong Dan, Jiqing Zhao, Yu Ding, Feng Ye, Huiqin Sun, Fan Jiang, Jin Cheng, Fahuan Yuan, Zhongmin Zou

Abstract

MicroRNA-34a (miR-34a) is a potential prognostic factor for survival in patients with several types of cancer according to previous clinical researches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the significance of increased miR-34a expression in the prognosis of patients' overall survival. The present systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 researches included 2,597 patients. Overexpression of miR-34a may predict good overall survival ([OS], HR =0.76, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-1.06, P=0.105), but the effect was not significant enough. Subgroup analysis results showed miR-34a was an ideal predictor for digestive system cancer (OS, HR =0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.99, P=0.048). The predictive effects of elevated expression of miR-34a on the OS of untreated and treated patients were not of obvious differences. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that miR-34a has a predictive effect on overall survival of patients with digestive system cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,597
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,164
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#49
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.