↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Peer supporter experiences of home visits for people with HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 330)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Peer supporter experiences of home visits for people with HIV infection
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), September 2015
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s89436
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han Ju Lee, Linda Moneyham, Hee Sun Kang, Kyung Sun Kim

Abstract

This study's purpose was to explore the experiences of peer supporters regarding their work in a home visit program for people with HIV infection. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using focus groups. Participants were 12 HIV-positive peer supporters conducting home visits with people living with HIV/AIDS in South Korea. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Six major themes emerged: feeling a sense of belonging; concern about financial support; facing HIV-related stigma and fear of disclosure; reaching out and acting as a bridge of hope; feeling burnout; and need for quality education. The study findings indicate that although peer supporters experience several positive aspects in the role, such as feelings of belonging, they also experience issues that make it difficult to be successful in the role, including the position's instability, work-related stress, and concerns about the quality of their continuing education. The findings suggest that to maintain a stable and effective peer supporter program, such positions require financial support, training in how to prevent and manage stress associated with the role, and a well-developed program of education and training.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Psychology 5 16%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,760,001
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#37
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,975
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them