↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Predictors of quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Predictors of quality of life in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s84929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc M Saad, Youssef El Douaihy, Christine Boumitri, Chetana Rondla, Elias Moussaly, Magda Daoud, Suzanne E El Sayegh

Abstract

Assessment of quality of life (QOL) of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients (physical, mental, and social well-being) has become an essential tool to develop better plans of care. Objective of this study is to determine which demographic and biochemical parameters correlate with the QOL scores in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis (HD) using Kidney Disease QOL-36 surveys (KDQOL). A retrospective chart review of all ESRD patients who underwent HD at an outpatient center. The five components of the KDQOL were the primary end points of this study (burden of kidney disease, symptoms and problems, effects of kidney disease on daily life, mental component survey, and physical component survey). Scores were grouped into three categories (below average, average, and above average). In addition to demographics (age, sex, and race), the independent variables such as weight gain, number of years on dialysis, urea reduction ratio, calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, albumin, and hemoglobin in the serum were collected. Chi-square analysis for dependent variables and the nominal independent variables was used, and analysis of variance analysis was used for continuous independent variables. Ordinal regression using PLUM (polytomous universal model) method was used to weigh out possible effects of confounders. The cohort size was 111 patients. Mean age was 61.8 (±15.5) years; there were more males than females (64.9% vs 35.1%), the mean time-on-dialysis at the time of the study was 4.3 (4.8) years. Approximately two-thirds of the responses on all five domains of the questionnaire ranked average when compared to the national numbers. The remainders were split between above average (20.6%) and below average (13.4%). In our cohort, no relationships were statistically significant between the five dependent variables of interest and the independent variables by chi-square- and t-test analyses. This was further confirmed by regression analysis. Of note, sex carried the strongest statistical significance (with a P-value of 0.16) as a predictor of "the burden of kidney disease on daily life" in ordinal regression. Prior studies have shown variables such as serum phosphate level, intradialytic weight gain, and dialysis adequacy are associated with lower KDQOL scores; however, this was not evident in our analysis likely due to smaller sample size. Larger size studies are required to better understand the predictors of QOL in ESRD patients on HD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 21%
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 30%
Psychology 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 16 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#183
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,163
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.