↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanotechnology in dentistry: prevention, diagnosis, and therapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Nanotechnology in dentistry: prevention, diagnosis, and therapy
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s86033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ensanya Ali Abou Neel, Laurent Bozec, Roman A Perez, Hae-Won Kim, Jonathan C Knowles

Abstract

Nanotechnology has rapidly expanded into all areas of science; it offers significant alternative ways to solve scientific and medical questions and problems. In dentistry, nanotechnology has been exploited in the development of restorative materials with some significant success. This review discusses nanointerfaces that could compromise the longevity of dental restorations, and how nanotechnolgy has been employed to modify them for providing long-term successful restorations. It also focuses on some challenging areas in dentistry, eg, oral biofilm and cancers, and how nanotechnology overcomes these challenges. The recent advances in nanodentistry and innovations in oral health-related diagnostic, preventive, and therapeutic methods required to maintain and obtain perfect oral health, have been discussed. The recent advances in nanotechnology could hold promise in bringing a paradigm shift in dental field. Although there are numerous complex therapies being developed to treat many diseases, their clinical use requires careful consideration of the expense of synthesis and implementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 236 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 76 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 35%
Materials Science 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Chemistry 9 4%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 86 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,860,444
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#272
of 4,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,571
of 287,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.