↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patient-reported outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: patients’ and primary care physicians’ perspectives in the Spanish health care system

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Patient-reported outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: patients’ and primary care physicians’ perspectives in the Spanish health care system
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s87005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josep Franch-Nadal, Elena Labrador Barba, M Carmen Gómez-García, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, José Manuel Millaruelo, María Luisa Orera Peña

Abstract

Understanding patients' and physicians' perceptions of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management and treatment has important implications for diabetes care, allowing the identification of clinical practice issues that could be improved, leading to patients' better understanding of the illness and, consequently, healthier self-management behaviors. The objective of this study was to identify differences between physicians' and T2DM patients' perceptions related to health status, patient-reported outcomes assessments, and T2DM management and treatment, in routine clinical practice in Spain. This was an observational, cross-sectional study including 1,012 T2DM patients and 974 physicians from 47 and 52 Spanish provinces, respectively. An electronic structured self-administered questionnaire containing 17 questions was designed aiming to address both physicians' and patient's perceptions on overall T2DM health status and patient-reported outcomes. T2DM patients perceived a worse health status (40% reported having a "good" and 38% a "neither good nor bad" health status) compared with physicians' perceptions (77% thought patients had a "good" health status). Most patients answered being "satisfied" or "neither satisfied nor unsatisfied" with the given information, while physicians considered that patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the information for self-monitoring blood glucose and treatment administration. Fifty-seven percent of patients reported that medical recommendations were "important", while 58% of physicians considered it as "very important". Fifty-three percent of patients perceived that their current T2DM treatment suited their preferences "quite a lot", and this was lower than the proportion of physicians (69%) that believed this for their patients. Additionally, a lower percentage of patients (53%) than physicians (79%) believed that their treatment improved their health-related quality of life "quite a lot". All differences between patients and physicians were statistically significant (P<0.001). Patients and physicians demonstrate different views concerning all questions related to T2DM health status and diabetes management and treatment (information, recommendations, satisfaction, and preferences).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 37%
Psychology 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,259,950
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#177
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,502
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.