↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reducing the risk of surgical site infection using a multidisciplinary approach: an integrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Reducing the risk of surgical site infection using a multidisciplinary approach: an integrative review
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s73565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigid M Gillespie, Evelyn Kang, Shelley Roberts, Frances Lin, Nicola Morley, Tracey Finigan, Allison Homer, Wendy Chaboyer

Abstract

To identify and describe the strategies and processes used by multidisciplinary teams of health care professionals to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). An integrative review of the research literature was undertaken. Searches were conducted in April 2015. Following review of the included studies, data were abstracted using summary tables and the methodological quality of each study assessed using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines by two reviewers. Discrepancies were dealt with through consensus. Inductive content analysis was used to identify and describe the strategies/processes used by multidisciplinary health care teams to prevent SSI. In total, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 studies used quantitative methods, while a single study used qualitative interviews. The majority of the studies were conducted in North America. All quantitative studies evaluated multifaceted quality-improvement interventions aimed at preventing SSI in patients undergoing surgery. Across the 13 studies reviewed, the following multidisciplinary team-based approaches were enacted: using a bundled approach, sharing responsibility, and, adhering to best practice. The majority of studies described team collaborations that were circumscribed by role. None of the reviewed studies used strategies that included the input of allied health professionals or patient participation in SSI prevention. Patient-centered interventions aimed at increasing patient participation in SSI prevention and evaluating the contributions of allied health professionals in team-based SSI prevention requires future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Other 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 28%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,215,559
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#355
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,031
of 274,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.