↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Tuberculosis case finding in first-degree relative contacts not living with index tuberculosis cases in Kampala, Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Tuberculosis case finding in first-degree relative contacts not living with index tuberculosis cases in Kampala, Uganda
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/clep.s82389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phalkun Chheng, Mary Nsereko, LaShaunda L Malone, Brenda Okware, Sarah Zalwango, Moses Joloba, W Henry Boom, Ezekiel Mupere, Catherine M Stein

Abstract

To assess the prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis among first-degree relative (FDR) contacts not living with tuberculosis (TB) cases. A cross-sectional analysis of household contacts living with an index TB case and FDR contacts living outside of households in Kampala, Uganda, is presented. A total of 177 contacts (52 FDRs and 125 index household contacts) of 31 TB cases were examined. Compared with index household contacts, FDR contacts were older, more likely to be TB symptomatic (50% vs 33%), had a higher percentage of abnormal chest X-rays (19% vs 11%), sputum smear positive (15% vs 5%), and many similar epidemiologic risk factors, including HIV infection (13% vs 10%). Contact groups had similar pulmonary tuberculosis prevalence: 9.6% in FDR vs 10.4% in index household contacts and similar Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: 62% in FDR vs 61% in index households. TB is common among FDR contacts. High TB prevalence justifies targeting FDRs during household contact investigations. Combining TB active-case finding among FDR contacts with household contact investigation in low-income setting is feasible. This should be part of national TB control program strategies for increasing TB case-detection rates and reducing community TB transmission and death.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 22%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,154,146
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#230
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,311
of 274,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.