↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Association between a relative afferent pupillary defect using pupillography and inner retinal atrophy in optic nerve disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Association between a relative afferent pupillary defect using pupillography and inner retinal atrophy in optic nerve disease
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/opth.s91278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Go Takizawa, Atsushi Miki, Fumiatsu Maeda, Katsutoshi Goto, Syunsuke Araki, Yoshiaki Ieki, Junichi Kiryu, Kiyoshi Yaoeda

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the asymmetrical light reflex of the control subjects and patients with optic nerve disease and to evaluate the relationships among the relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), visual acuity (VA), central critical fusion frequency (CFF), ganglion cell complex thickness (GCCT), and circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (cpRNFLT) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Using a pupillography device, the RAPD scores from 15 patients with unilateral optic nerve disease and 35 control subjects were compared. The diagnostic accuracy of the RAPD amplitude and latency scores was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Thereafter, we assessed the relationships among the RAPD scores, VA, central CFF, GCCT, and cpRNFLT. The average RAPD amplitude score in patients with optic nerve disease was significantly higher than that of the control subjects (P<0.001). The average RAPD latency score in patients with optic nerve disease was significantly higher than that of the control subjects (P=0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the RAPD amplitude score was significantly higher than that for the latency score (P=0.010). The correlation coefficients for the RAPD amplitude and latency scores were 0.847 (P<0.001) and 0.874 (P<0.001) for VA, -0.868 (P<0.001) and -0.896 (P<0.001) for central CFF, -0.593 (P=0.020) and -0.540 (P=0.038) for GCCT, and -0.267 (P=0.337) and -0.228 (P=0.413) for cpRNFLT, respectively. Our results suggest that pupillography is useful for detecting optic nerve disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,551
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,307
of 286,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#45
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.