↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s70313
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salvatore Giordano, Mikael Victorzon

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the effectiveness and safety of bariatric/metabolic surgery in elderly patients. We performed a systematic review on this issue in patients aged 60 years or older. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until August 2015 for studies on outcomes of bariatric surgery in elderly patients. The results were expressed as pooled proportions (%) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated by the I (2) test, and a random-effects model was used. Twenty-six articles encompassing 8,149 patients were pertinent with this issue and included data on bariatric surgery outcomes in elderly population. Fourteen patients died during the 30-day postoperative period, with a pooled mortality of 0.01%. Pooled overall complication rate was 14.7%. At 1-year follow-up, pooled mean excess weight loss was 53.77%, pooled diabetes resolution was 54.5%, and pooled hypertension resolution was 42.5%, while pooled lipid disorder resolution was 41.2%. Outcomes and complication rates of bariatric surgery in patients older than 60 years are comparable to those in a younger population, independent of the type of procedure performed. Patients should not be denied bariatric surgery because of their age alone.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 46 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#748
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,207
of 290,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#20
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.