↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Trends in dementia diagnosis rates in UK ethnic groups: analysis of UK primary care data

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 786)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
73 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Trends in dementia diagnosis rates in UK ethnic groups: analysis of UK primary care data
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/clep.s152647
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tra My Pham, Irene Petersen, Kate Walters, Rosalind Raine, Jill Manthorpe, Naaheed Mukadam, Claudia Cooper

Abstract

We compared incidence of dementia diagnosis by white, black, and Asian ethnic groups and estimated the proportion of UK white and black people developing dementia in 2015 who had a diagnosis for the first time in a UK-wide study. We analyzed primary care electronic health records from The Health Improvement Network database between 2007 and 2015 and compared incidence of dementia diagnosis to dementia incidence from community cohort studies. The study sample comprised of 2,511,681 individuals aged 50-105 years who did not have a dementia diagnosis prior to the start of follow-up. A total of 66,083 individuals had a dementia diagnosis (4.87/1,000 person-years at risk, 95% CI 4.83-4.90); this incidence increased from 3.75 to 5.65/1,000 person-years at risk between 2007 and 2015. Compared with white women, the incidence of dementia diagnosis was 18% lower among Asian women (adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.95) and 25% higher among black women (IRR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.46). For men, incidence of dementia diagnosis was 28% higher in the black ethnic group (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50) and 12% lower in the Asian ethnic group (IRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.76-1.01) relative to the white ethnic group. Based on diagnosis incidence in The Health Improvement Network data and projections of incidence from community cohort studies, we estimated that 42% of black men developing dementia in 2015 were diagnosed compared with 53% of white men. People from the black ethnic group had a higher incidence of dementia diagnosis and those from the Asian ethnic group had lower incidence compared with the white ethnic group. We estimated that black men developing dementia were less likely than white men to have a diagnosis of dementia, indicating that the increased risk of dementia diagnosis reported in the black ethnic group might underestimate the higher risk of dementia in this group. It is unclear whether the lower incidence of dementia diagnosis in the Asian ethnic group reflects lower community incidence or underdiagnosis. A cohort study to determine this is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 55 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 20%
Psychology 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 64 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#286,303
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#15
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,072
of 337,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.